Are you threatening me?! You dare threaten the great cornholio?!

Do I seriously have to report an article to comment on it being low quality? Or contribute articles to SPECIFICALLY this portion of newsboiler?

I did NOT say this article deserved a report. I just said that it lacked substance, wouldn't be popular if it wasn't a dig at iPhone, and that the distinction between modern phone camera and pro-camera aren't enough for anyone to be turned away from an article.

You even went as far as to call the article "stupid" and you're criticizing me for criticizing the article and the obvious reason that it has so much degrees to it? I honestly don't get it. Why are you pickin' on little ol' me? :'(

*Facepalm* lol. What I'm saying is that changes are coming so that it's easier for users to rate articles. Anyway, there is actually a "Lame" report if articles aren't up to par in terms of standard. I rarely use it because of my position, but it's there for you guys. If no one steps up, then that approve button is gonna continually get raped. The problem is that if I were the only one doing it, contributors would accuse me of being biased and taking things personlly (an everyday problem). I'm not trying to fight you down here, but trying to get more users to actually help weed out quality articles from sub-par content. I personally thing this article is pointless because it states the obvious, but I try not to get involved too often. Hope you see where I'm coming from.

Edit - I think because everyone has gotten so accustomed to just approving that it's hard to make a culture shift back to where quality matters vs quantity or flame articles. I'm sure if a few people start stepping up, eventually others would chip in to help fiddle the kind of material we get around here (i.e. push the good stuff and weed out the bad). Also you are free to express an opinion. I've never had any problems with your opinions because at least you justify them. As I mentioned, you don't have to do it all the time, but once some people get the trend going, the overall effort should help weed out bad content.

Well the article isn't at all wrong. It's just making mountains out of molehills. No one is going to throw their computer out a window because an article has pictures taken with the 'gravely inferior' modern mobile phone camera.

I'm well aware of the "lame" report as I've done PLENTY of contributing on other portions of newsboiler. The article isn't lame (just a bit overzealous and getting more attention because of a very real bias on techspy) and I couldn't report it if I wanted to (being a "trainee" on this portion of newsboiler).

I guess I still don't see what your point is. I just made a remark about how it isn't a big deal. That's all.