that is the irony, it's just a moon still people know so less about the moon. The moon is there but no one can explain the reason why it is there. Why the moon is larger than a freaking planet, why moon is made of non planetry objects,. . . .Yeah, you are right. It's just a moon

More like smoking too much stuff!!! I wonder if the writer has ever visited the planet earth lol

Well said. People are too quick to believe everything they are told because it comes from a 'reputable source'. Just remember, there was a time when everyone on the planet thought the Earth was flat!

thank you!!! well said!!

what if all the numbers and calculations they come up with are entirely wrong, since its all based on a theory lol. The foundation of their source material from which they derive all their "factual data" like stones being billions of years old, or how the Universe is 15 billion years old. LOL we're stuck on Earth and everything that is talked about in regards to the universe is pure speculation and theory.

Science is still very far behind in regards to what we know about anything that is outside of Earths Atmosphere. I laugh at those discovery shows where they show artists impressions of outer planets and what life "might be like" lmao No one know what the fuck is really going on up there

What if stars are not as distant as we think they are? what if the Universe isnt that old to begin with? so many questions and not even the most educated most decorated scholar can answer those questions, for he too is bound to earth

Here's the thing: their theories (scientific theories, not the "it's just a theory" kind) are made of demonstrable bodies of work, comprised of research and experimentation, that they have poured countless hours into and had them reviewed by thousands of others of higher or similar acumen. This body of work has been built up over thousands of years, most recently using a process we call "science."

Now, you can choose to accept these people as the authority on the matter, who would have no good reason to hide things like this from you (and it would be impossible to on such a massive scale), or you can choose to believe someone who skimmed through some public domain documents/journals (NASA's in this case), cherry-picked information to fit a narrative (or simply didn't understand what they were reading, as is often the case), and has no professional or legally protected credentials to proclaim themselves an authority on the matter. This does not merely pertain to this case, it pertains to all similar cases (like nutritionists telling you your dietician/doctor is a liar).

Which sounds like the more reasonable choice to you?

He didn't pass on Earth. He passed on the Moon.

I am scratching my head thinking the same. The language is just too atrocious to get a thumbs up here on techspy.

It's listed as myth on the contributing site.